Joe Cooper
2017-04-04 12:30:43 UTC
Despite bombshell reports yesterday claiming that Obama National Security
Advisor Susan Rice unmasked members of the Trump campaign and Trump
transition team while reviewing raw intelligence, that such unmasked
information was widely distributed among top members of the Obama
administration, and that Rice asked for continuous updates on
communications between foreign targets and the Trump team after Trump won
the Republican nomination, the media have decided that the story simply
isnt worth covering.
CNNs Don Lemon stated that the media should not aid and abet the
people creating a diversion over Susan Rice. As Newsbusters reports,
CBS Margaret Brennan cited sources stating that Rices activity was
perfectly normal and not improper. The New York Times echoed that claim.
ABC News and NBC News didnt cover the story at all.
But the story is huge.
Here are three reasons why.
1. The Obama Administration Targeted The Trump Team. The story is huge
because its just more evidence that the Obama administration used
government to target its political opposition. Theres no evidence Rice
did anything illegal here. But its certainly an abuse of power to use
the power of unmasking to keep tabs on your political opposition without
any evidence of wrongdoing, as Rice reportedly did. If theyd found
anything nefarious but non-criminal, what would they have done about it?
Would that information have died a quiet death amidst the other
intelligence reports spreading around the top levels of the Obama
administration? Or would it have made its way to the press, as
information about Mike Flynns innocuous contacts with the Russian
Ambassador did after the election? As The Wall Street Journal editorial
board states, Ms. Rice would have had no obvious need to unmask Trump
campaign officials other than political curiosity.
2. Rice Lied. Last month, Rice told PBS Newshour that she knew nothing
about surveillance of the Trump team. But she knew that the Trump team
was caught up in incidental surveillance, obviously. We know that Rice
has a habit of lying to protect her former boss, President Obama. Was
this just another instance of such lying?
3. This Makes The Lefts Trump-Russia Theories More Strained. Weve been
hearing for months that Team Trump had nefarious ties with the Russian
government, that collusion took place between the Trump campaign and
Russian sources in order to coordinate the release of damaging
information from the DNC hacks. But if Rice was monitoring all
intelligence that came up regarding the Trump campaign, then wheres the
evidence that any of this supposedly nefarious activity was occurring?
The Rice story is a major story. It doesnt mean that Americans dont
have a right to be suspicious of supposed connections between Trump and
Russia; it also doesnt mean that Trump had his wires tapped or was the
target of spying, as Tucker Carlson put it last night on Fox News. But
Trump and his team were a political target of the Obama administration,
and they apparently did everything they could within the law, including
abuse of power, to dig up information on the Republican running against
their former Secretary of State.
Source: http://bit.ly/2o5jHKv
Advisor Susan Rice unmasked members of the Trump campaign and Trump
transition team while reviewing raw intelligence, that such unmasked
information was widely distributed among top members of the Obama
administration, and that Rice asked for continuous updates on
communications between foreign targets and the Trump team after Trump won
the Republican nomination, the media have decided that the story simply
isnt worth covering.
CNNs Don Lemon stated that the media should not aid and abet the
people creating a diversion over Susan Rice. As Newsbusters reports,
CBS Margaret Brennan cited sources stating that Rices activity was
perfectly normal and not improper. The New York Times echoed that claim.
ABC News and NBC News didnt cover the story at all.
But the story is huge.
Here are three reasons why.
1. The Obama Administration Targeted The Trump Team. The story is huge
because its just more evidence that the Obama administration used
government to target its political opposition. Theres no evidence Rice
did anything illegal here. But its certainly an abuse of power to use
the power of unmasking to keep tabs on your political opposition without
any evidence of wrongdoing, as Rice reportedly did. If theyd found
anything nefarious but non-criminal, what would they have done about it?
Would that information have died a quiet death amidst the other
intelligence reports spreading around the top levels of the Obama
administration? Or would it have made its way to the press, as
information about Mike Flynns innocuous contacts with the Russian
Ambassador did after the election? As The Wall Street Journal editorial
board states, Ms. Rice would have had no obvious need to unmask Trump
campaign officials other than political curiosity.
2. Rice Lied. Last month, Rice told PBS Newshour that she knew nothing
about surveillance of the Trump team. But she knew that the Trump team
was caught up in incidental surveillance, obviously. We know that Rice
has a habit of lying to protect her former boss, President Obama. Was
this just another instance of such lying?
3. This Makes The Lefts Trump-Russia Theories More Strained. Weve been
hearing for months that Team Trump had nefarious ties with the Russian
government, that collusion took place between the Trump campaign and
Russian sources in order to coordinate the release of damaging
information from the DNC hacks. But if Rice was monitoring all
intelligence that came up regarding the Trump campaign, then wheres the
evidence that any of this supposedly nefarious activity was occurring?
The Rice story is a major story. It doesnt mean that Americans dont
have a right to be suspicious of supposed connections between Trump and
Russia; it also doesnt mean that Trump had his wires tapped or was the
target of spying, as Tucker Carlson put it last night on Fox News. But
Trump and his team were a political target of the Obama administration,
and they apparently did everything they could within the law, including
abuse of power, to dig up information on the Republican running against
their former Secretary of State.
Source: http://bit.ly/2o5jHKv
--
"You will never understand today's rage on the left, or its real effort
to overthrow American constitutional government, if you do not understand
lynch mobs -- KKK, Leninist, Soros-sponsored, and Obama-controlled."--
James Lewis, "Lynch Mobs of the Left," http://bit.ly/2lwmH2y
"You will never understand today's rage on the left, or its real effort
to overthrow American constitutional government, if you do not understand
lynch mobs -- KKK, Leninist, Soros-sponsored, and Obama-controlled."--
James Lewis, "Lynch Mobs of the Left," http://bit.ly/2lwmH2y